Manejo de las epistaxis graves y/o refractarias / Management of severe and/or refractory epistaxis

Introducción y objetivos: El objetivo fue determinar los resultados del tratamiento de las epistaxis graves y/o refractarias que requirieron ingreso hospitalario. Además se compararon los resultados del tratamiento mediante ligadura arterial o embolización. Material y método: Se incluyeron de forma prospectiva 63 pacientes con epistaxis grave y/o refractaria que requirieron ingreso hospitalario entre agosto de 2014 y diciembre de 2016. Resultados: En 11 pacientes (17%) se realizó embolización, 5 (8%) fueron intervenidos mediante endoscopia y en los 47 restantes (75%) se realizó tratamiento conservador. La edad media de los pacientes en los que las medidas conservadoras fueron suficientes fue de 72 años, mientras que la edad de aquellos tratados con embolización fue de 71 años y de los que fueron intervenidos quirúrgicamente fue de 53 años. En los pacientes sometidos a tratamiento conservador o a cirugía la estancia media fue de 6 días, frente a 9 días en aquellos en los que se realizó embolización. Un paciente sufrió un ictus hemisférico tras la embolización. No se observaron complicaciones posquirúrgicas. Conclusiones: La mayoría de los pacientes con epistaxis graves y/o refractarias se resuelven mediante taponamiento convencional. El tratamiento mediante ligadura arterial está asociado a una disminución de la estancia hospitalaria, sin observarse complicaciones graves. Es aconsejable disponer de todas las opciones terapéuticas posibles para lo cual la presencia de radiólogos intervencionistas y cirujanos experimentados es fundamental para evitar complicaciones y decidir el tratamiento a realizar de forma individual en cada paciente

Objective: The objective was to determine the results of the treatment of severe and/or refractory epistaxis requiring hospital admission. In addition, the results of arterial ligation versus embolization were compared. Material and method: Sixty-three patients with severe and/or refractory epistaxis requiring hospital admission between August 2014 and December 2016 were included prospectively. Results: Eleven patients (17%) underwent embolization, 5 (8%) endoscopy ligation and the remaining 47 (75%) underwent conservative treatment with tamponade. The mean age of the patients in which conservative measures were sufficient was 72 years, while the age of those treated with embolization was 71 years and of those who underwent surgery was 53 years. For the patients who underwent conservative treatment or surgery, the average stay was 6 days, compared to 9 days for those who underwent embolization. One patient suffered a hemispheric stroke after embolization. No post-surgical complications were observed. Conclusions: Most cases of severe and/or refractory epistaxis are resolved by conventional tamponade. Endoscopy ligation is associated with a decrease in hospital stay, without serious complications. It is advisable to have all the possible therapeutic options available, for which the presence of interventional radiologists and experienced surgeons is essential to avoid complications and decide the treatment to be performed individually for each patient

Manejo de los carcinomas diferenciados de tiroides / Management of differentiated thyroid carcinomas

Introducción y objetivos: El tratamiento principal de los carcinomas diferenciados de tiroides es la cirugía seguida de radioyodo. El propósito de este estudio es exponer nuestra experiencia en el manejo de estos tumores. Material y método: Se presenta un estudio retrospectivo de los 55 pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente de un carcinoma diferenciado de tiroides en nuestro hospital entre los años 2007 y 2011. Resultados: La edad media al diagnóstico fue de 49 años, con un predominio femenino (78% de los casos). El 78% de los pacientes se encontraban en fases iniciales (estadios i y ii). El diagnóstico histopatológico definitivo fue de carcinoma papilar en el 84% y folicular en el 16% restante. A todos, salvo a 2 pacientes (4%), se les realizó una tiroidectomía total, acompañada de linfadenectomía en el 58% de los casos. Un 9% de los pacientes presentó hipoparatiroidismo permanente y aunque un 18% sufrió parálisis recurrencial unilateral transitoria, un 40% de ellos se recuperó completamente a los 6 meses. Se administró radioyodo en el postoperatorio al 89% de los pacientes. Se produjo un 40% de recidivas, la mayor parte de las cuales (29% de los pacientes) se localizaron a nivel cervical. La supervivencia a los 5 años fue del 87%, siendo del 95% en el subtipo papilar y descendiendo al 56% en el folicular (p = 0,001). Discusión/conclusiones: Los carcinomas diferenciados de tiroides son tumores con un pronóstico excelente tras un tratamiento quirúrgico adecuado previa valoración preoperatoria exhaustiva y seguimiento postoperatorio estricto debido a las tasas significativas de recidiva

Introduction and objectives: Radioiodine is the principal treatment for differentiated thyroid carcinomas. The aim of this study is to present our experience in the management of these tumours. Material and method: We present a retrospective study of 55 patients operated for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in our hospital between 2007 and 2011. Results: The mean age at time of diagnosis was 49 years, and females predominated (78% of cases). Seventy eight percent of the patients were in the initial stages (stages i and ii). The definitive histopathological diagnosis was papillary carcinoma in 84% and follicular carcinoma in the remaining 16%. All of the patients, with the exception of 2 (4%), underwent total thyroidectomy, with lymphadenectomy in 58% of cases. Nine percent of the patients had permanent hypoparathyroidism and although 18% suffered transitory unilateral paralysis, 40% of these female patients had completely recovered after 6 months. Eighty-nine percent of the patients were given radioiodine postoperatively. There was a recurrence rate of 40% most of which was at cervical level (29% of the patients). Survival at 5 years was 87%, 95% of the papillary subtype, falling to 56% of the follicular subtype (P = .001). Discussion/conclusions: The prognosis for differentiated thyroid carcinomas is excellent after appropriate surgical treatment, thorough preoperative assessment,and strict postoperative follow-up due to the significant recurrence rates

Management of differentiated thyroid carcinomas. / Manejo de los carcinomas diferenciados de tiroides.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Radioiodine is the principal treatment for differentiated thyroid carcinomas. The aim of this study is to present our experience in the management of these tumours. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We present a retrospective study of 55 patients operated for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in our hospital between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: The mean age at time of diagnosis was 49 years, and females predominated (78% of cases). Seventy eight percent of the patients were in the initial stages (stages i and ii). The definitive histopathological diagnosis was papillary carcinoma in 84% and follicular carcinoma in the remaining 16%. All of the patients, with the exception of 2 (4%), underwent total thyroidectomy, with lymphadenectomy in 58% of cases. Nine percent of the patients had permanent hypoparathyroidism and although 18% suffered transitory unilateral paralysis, 40% of these female patients had completely recovered after 6 months. Eighty-nine percent of the patients were given radioiodine postoperatively. There was a recurrence rate of 40% most of which was at cervical level (29% of the patients). Survival at 5 years was 87%, 95% of the papillary subtype, falling to 56% of the follicular subtype (P=.001). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for differentiated thyroid carcinomas is excellent after appropriate surgical treatment, thorough preoperative assessment,and strict postoperative follow-up due to the significant recurrence rates.

Management of severe and/or refractory epistaxis. / Manejo de las epistaxis graves y/o refractarias.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the results of the treatment of severe and/or refractory epistaxis requiring hospital admission. In addition, the results of arterial ligation versus embolization were compared. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty-three patients with severe and/or refractory epistaxis requiring hospital admission between August 2014 and December 2016 were included prospectively. RESULTS: Eleven patients (17%) underwent embolization, 5 (8%) endoscopy ligation and the remaining 47 (75%) underwent conservative treatment with tamponade. The mean age of the patients in which conservative measures were sufficient was 72 years, while the age of those treated with embolization was 71 years and of those who underwent surgery was 53 years. For the patients who underwent conservative treatment or surgery, the average stay was 6 days, compared to 9 days for those who underwent embolization. One patient suffered a hemispheric stroke after embolization. No post-surgical complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of severe and/or refractory epistaxis are resolved by conventional tamponade. Endoscopy ligation is associated with a decrease in hospital stay, without serious complications. It is advisable to have all the possible therapeutic options available, for which the presence of interventional radiologists and experienced surgeons is essential to avoid complications and decide the treatment to be performed individually for each patient.